What is definitely the principle of browse in functionality characteristics and variations between 7200revening (SATA/SAS) and 15000revening (SAS) hard disc runs of the same generation?
HDD: performance differences between 7.2k SATA and 15k SAS. Ask Question 9. What is the rule of thumb in performance characteristics and differences between 7200rpm (SATA/SAS) and 15000rpm (SAS) hard disc drives of the same generation? For a 15K RPM drive, a seek-time of 2.6ms and latency of 2.0ms gives an IOPS number of 217.
ewwhite
176k8080 gold badges380380 silver precious metal badges734734 bronze badges
cnstcnst7,96866 silver badges3636 silver badges5656 bronze badges
3 Answers
It's a situation of mathematics. I/O-per-second is usually driven by the following computation:
Random I/U = 1000/ (average latency + seek time)
For a 7.2K RPM commute, a seek-time of 8.5ms i9000 and latency of 4.16 gives an IOPS amount of 78.
For a 15K RPM travel, a seek-time of 2.6mt and latency of 2.0ms gives an IOPS quantity of 217.
For a 15K RPM push, a seek-time of 3.4mbeds and latency of 2.0ms gives an IOPS quantity of 185.
For a 15K RPM push, a seek-time of 3.4mbeds and latency of 2.0ms gives an IOPS quantity of 185.
These are just good examples centered on a choice of current (as of this writing) turns from Seagate.
User interface (SAS vs SATA) doesn'capital t impact these figures meaningfully. The RPMs are what determine the performance. Sequential I/O performance is usually a different quantity, but most server I/O these times is considerably random.
As you can observe, the functionality distinction between the two tiers of acceleration can be quite substantial.
sysadmin1138♦sysadmin1138118k1717 silver badges150150 gold badges282282 bronze badges
In brief, they have different features and purposes.
7200rpm disks are bigger and slower. 10000rpm and 15000rpm disks are smaller sized and faster. The latter are intended for higher transactional and higher arbitrary I/U workloads. The former are better for sequential exchange and high capacity requirements.
From Horsepower's documentation:
Horsepower Access (SATA 7.2k)memory sticks possess the most affordable unit cost and give you a fundamental degree of dependability and functionality. They are best appropriate for non-mission-critical environments where I/O workloads are usually 40 percent or much less. They are usually typically finest appropriate for inner/archival storage space or as boot drives for entry-level servers.
HP Midline (SAS 7.2k)runs give you larger capacity and greater dependability than Entry drives. Midline runs are even more proof to rotational and operational vibration, so they are usually better appropriate for use in multi-drive designs. Horsepower Midline drives are usually for high-capacity applications such as external storage that may require increased reliability. Like Entrance drives, nevertheless, Midline memory sticks are for make use of in moderate workload conditions. We perform not suggest Admittance or Midline turns for mission-critical programs.
Horsepower Enterprise (SAS 10k/15k)memory sticks provide you maximum reliability, highest performance, scalability, and error administration under the almost all demanding circumstances. They are usually the only HP runs created for use at unconstrained I/U workloads. They are for mission-critical programs like as large databases, e-mail machines, and back-office.
ewwhiteewwhite176k8080 gold badges380380 sterling silver badges734734 bronze badges
From a value stage of see, one can often get much better real entire world overall performance out of even more SATA 7.2k pushes than less SAS 15k runs with the price being very similar. You'll see that larger buildouts like Backblaze make use of SATA and that'h because the worth is therefore much better and if you make use of multiple SATA drives, the functionality can match for typical storage a good deal.
Adam NelsonAdam Nelson63922 silver badges99 silver precious metal badges1111 bronze badges